Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams

Un problème avec la messagerie ? C'est ici !
Répondre
lasource
Messages : 3
Enregistré le : 21 août 2013 17:08
Compte LegTux : lasource

Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams

Message par lasource » 21 août 2013 17:14

Bonjour,

J'ai des adresses emails associées à mon nom de domaine perso qui sont gérées par legtux.org. J'utilise le service smtp de legtux pour envoyer des mails.

Mais voilà, j'ai de plus en plus de retours comme quoi mes mails finissent dans les boites à spam. Ça deviens un problème puisque je suis maintenant obligé de prévenir les gens via mon ancienne boite gmail que je leur ai envoyé un mail.

Est ce que je sois déclarer mon nom de domaine sur une liste blanche ou autre ou bien est ce que tout dépend du serveur smtp ?

Merci de votre aide.

Avatar du membre
Guillaume
Administrateur
Messages : 703
Enregistré le : 04 sept. 2010 12:50
Compte LegTux : rguillaume
Localisation : Montluçon

Re: Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams

Message par Guillaume » 24 août 2013 08:57

Bonjour,

Avez-vous un enregistrement SPF ?

Cordialement,

lasource
Messages : 3
Enregistré le : 21 août 2013 17:08
Compte LegTux : lasource

Re: Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams

Message par lasource » 05 sept. 2013 14:21

Non en effet,

Du coup je me suis renseigné

Est ce que la ligne suivante est correcte ? :

Code : Tout sélectionner

v=spf1 a mx include:legtux.org -all


Merci de votre aide.

lasource
Messages : 3
Enregistré le : 21 août 2013 17:08
Compte LegTux : lasource

Re: Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams

Message par lasource » 16 sept. 2013 00:07

Bon ça ne marche pas, entre temps j'ai essayé en enlevant le "a" ca change rien la j'en suis à:

Code : Tout sélectionner

v=spf1 redirect=legtux.org


et pas mieux

j'utilise le service auth-results@verifier.port25.com qui me renvoie toujours :

Code : Tout sélectionner

This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier
service at verifier.port25.com.  The service allows email senders to perform
a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms.  It is provided
free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community.  While
it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at
<verifier-feedback@port25.com>.

Thank you for using the verifier,

The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team

==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check:          neutral
DomainKeys check:   neutral
DKIM check:         neutral
Sender-ID check:    neutral
SpamAssassin check: ham

==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================

HELO hostname:  mail.legtux.org
Source IP:      91.121.155.10
mail-from:      louis.delmas@la-source.me

----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         neutral (SPF-Result: None)
ID(s) verified: smtp.mailfrom=louis.delmas@la-source.me
DNS record(s):
    la-source.me. 3461 IN CNAME legtux.org.

----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: header.From=louis.delmas@la-source.me
DNS record(s):

----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified:

NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs
(RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for
older versions.  If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use
version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.

----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         neutral (SPF-Result: None)
ID(s) verified: header.From=louis.delmas@la-source.me
DNS record(s):
    la-source.me. 3461 IN CNAME legtux.org.

----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.3.1 (2010-03-16)

Result:         ham  (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT   RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
                            [91.121.155.10 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
-1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]

==========================================================
Explanation of the possible results (from RFC 5451)
==========================================================

SPF and Sender-ID Results
=========================

"none"
      No policy records were published at the sender's DNS domain.

"neutral"
      The sender's ADMD has asserted that it cannot or does not
      want to assert whether or not the sending IP address is authorized
      to send mail using the sender's DNS domain.

"pass"
      The client is authorized by the sender's ADMD to inject or
      relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain.

"policy"
     The client is authorized to inject or relay mail on behalf
      of the sender's DNS domain according to the authentication
      method's algorithm, but local policy dictates that the result is
      unacceptable.

"fail"
      This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or
      relay mail using the sender's DNS domain.

"softfail"
      The sender's ADMD believes the client was not authorized
      to inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain, but is
      unwilling to make a strong assertion to that effect.

"temperror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
      retrieve a policy record from DNS.  A later attempt may produce a
      final result.

"permerror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent or
      a syntax error in a retrieved DNS TXT record.  A later attempt is
      unlikely to produce a final result.


DKIM and DomainKeys Results
===========================

"none"
      The message was not signed.

"pass"
      The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
      acceptable to the verifier, and the signature(s) passed
      verification tests.

"fail"
      The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
      acceptable to the verifier, but they failed the verification
      test(s).

"policy"
      The message was signed but the signature or signatures were
      not acceptable to the verifier.

"neutral"
      The message was signed but the signature or signatures
      contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
      processed.  This result SHOULD also be used for other
      failures not covered elsewhere in this list.

"temperror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability
      to retrieve a public key.  A later attempt may produce a
      final result.

"permerror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being
      absent. A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.


==========================================================
Original Email
==========================================================

Return-Path: <louis.delmas@la-source.me>
Received: from mail.legtux.org (91.121.155.10) by verifier.port25.com id h6otns11u9c2 for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 18:58:06 -0400 (envelope-from <louis.delmas@la-source.me>)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; spf=neutral (SPF-Result: None) smtp.mailfrom=louis.delmas@la-source.me
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; domainkeys=neutral (message not signed) header.From=louis.delmas@la-source.me
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; sender-id=neutral (SPF-Result: None) header.From=louis.delmas@la-source.me
Received: by mail.legtux.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
   id 114FA59C0825; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:58:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on legtux-1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
   autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (APuteaux-651-1-191-233.w92-154.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.154.94.233])
   (Authenticated sender: lasource@legtux.org)
   by mail.legtux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9624B59C0825
   for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:58:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <52363B7C.8070403@la-source.me>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:58:04 +0200
From: Louis Delmas <louis.delmas@la-source.me>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130821 Icedove/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: check-auth@verifier.port25.com
Subject: Re:
References: <522D98DA.2000706@la-source.me> <5236352D.5090402@la-source.me> <52363AF0.5030003@la-source.me>
In-Reply-To: <52363AF0.5030003@la-source.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Le 16/09/2013 00:55, Louis Delmas a écrit :
>


Serais-il possible d'obtenir de l'aide svp ??

Répondre