Bonjour,
J'ai des adresses emails associées à mon nom de domaine perso qui sont gérées par legtux.org. J'utilise le service smtp de legtux pour envoyer des mails.
Mais voilà, j'ai de plus en plus de retours comme quoi mes mails finissent dans les boites à spam. Ça deviens un problème puisque je suis maintenant obligé de prévenir les gens via mon ancienne boite gmail que je leur ai envoyé un mail.
Est ce que je sois déclarer mon nom de domaine sur une liste blanche ou autre ou bien est ce que tout dépend du serveur smtp ?
Merci de votre aide.
Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams
- Guillaume
- Administrateur
- Messages : 703
- Enregistré le : 04 sept. 2010 12:50
- Compte LegTux : rguillaume
- Localisation : Montluçon
Re: Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams
Bonjour,
Avez-vous un enregistrement SPF ?
Cordialement,
Avez-vous un enregistrement SPF ?
Cordialement,
Re: Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams
Non en effet,
Du coup je me suis renseigné
Est ce que la ligne suivante est correcte ? :
Merci de votre aide.
Du coup je me suis renseigné
Est ce que la ligne suivante est correcte ? :
Code : Tout sélectionner
v=spf1 a mx include:legtux.org -all
Re: Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams
Bon ça ne marche pas, entre temps j'ai essayé en enlevant le "a" ca change rien la j'en suis à:
et pas mieux
j'utilise le service auth-results@verifier.port25.com qui me renvoie toujours :
Serais-il possible d'obtenir de l'aide svp ??
Code : Tout sélectionner
v=spf1 redirect=legtux.org
j'utilise le service auth-results@verifier.port25.com qui me renvoie toujours :
Code : Tout sélectionner
This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier
service at verifier.port25.com. The service allows email senders to perform
a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided
free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While
it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at
<verifier-feedback@port25.com>.
Thank you for using the verifier,
The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team
==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check: neutral
DomainKeys check: neutral
DKIM check: neutral
Sender-ID check: neutral
SpamAssassin check: ham
==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================
HELO hostname: mail.legtux.org
Source IP: 91.121.155.10
mail-from: louis.delmas@la-source.me
----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: neutral (SPF-Result: None)
ID(s) verified: smtp.mailfrom=louis.delmas@la-source.me
DNS record(s):
la-source.me. 3461 IN CNAME legtux.org.
----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: header.From=louis.delmas@la-source.me
DNS record(s):
----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified:
NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs
(RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for
older versions. If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use
version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.
----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result: neutral (SPF-Result: None)
ID(s) verified: header.From=louis.delmas@la-source.me
DNS record(s):
la-source.me. 3461 IN CNAME legtux.org.
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.3.1 (2010-03-16)
Result: ham (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
[91.121.155.10 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
==========================================================
Explanation of the possible results (from RFC 5451)
==========================================================
SPF and Sender-ID Results
=========================
"none"
No policy records were published at the sender's DNS domain.
"neutral"
The sender's ADMD has asserted that it cannot or does not
want to assert whether or not the sending IP address is authorized
to send mail using the sender's DNS domain.
"pass"
The client is authorized by the sender's ADMD to inject or
relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain.
"policy"
The client is authorized to inject or relay mail on behalf
of the sender's DNS domain according to the authentication
method's algorithm, but local policy dictates that the result is
unacceptable.
"fail"
This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or
relay mail using the sender's DNS domain.
"softfail"
The sender's ADMD believes the client was not authorized
to inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain, but is
unwilling to make a strong assertion to that effect.
"temperror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
retrieve a policy record from DNS. A later attempt may produce a
final result.
"permerror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent or
a syntax error in a retrieved DNS TXT record. A later attempt is
unlikely to produce a final result.
DKIM and DomainKeys Results
===========================
"none"
The message was not signed.
"pass"
The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the verifier, and the signature(s) passed
verification tests.
"fail"
The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
acceptable to the verifier, but they failed the verification
test(s).
"policy"
The message was signed but the signature or signatures were
not acceptable to the verifier.
"neutral"
The message was signed but the signature or signatures
contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
processed. This result SHOULD also be used for other
failures not covered elsewhere in this list.
"temperror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability
to retrieve a public key. A later attempt may produce a
final result.
"permerror"
The message could not be verified due to some error that
is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being
absent. A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.
==========================================================
Original Email
==========================================================
Return-Path: <louis.delmas@la-source.me>
Received: from mail.legtux.org (91.121.155.10) by verifier.port25.com id h6otns11u9c2 for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 18:58:06 -0400 (envelope-from <louis.delmas@la-source.me>)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; spf=neutral (SPF-Result: None) smtp.mailfrom=louis.delmas@la-source.me
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; domainkeys=neutral (message not signed) header.From=louis.delmas@la-source.me
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; sender-id=neutral (SPF-Result: None) header.From=louis.delmas@la-source.me
Received: by mail.legtux.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
id 114FA59C0825; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:58:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on legtux-1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (APuteaux-651-1-191-233.w92-154.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.154.94.233])
(Authenticated sender: lasource@legtux.org)
by mail.legtux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9624B59C0825
for <check-auth@verifier.port25.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:58:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <52363B7C.8070403@la-source.me>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 00:58:04 +0200
From: Louis Delmas <louis.delmas@la-source.me>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130821 Icedove/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: check-auth@verifier.port25.com
Subject: Re:
References: <522D98DA.2000706@la-source.me> <5236352D.5090402@la-source.me> <52363AF0.5030003@la-source.me>
In-Reply-To: <52363AF0.5030003@la-source.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Le 16/09/2013 00:55, Louis Delmas a écrit :
>
Re: Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams
Bonjour à tous,
Je relance ce vieux sujet car même sanction pour ma part : Les noms de domaines Free, Orange et Google me giclent vers spam automatiquement....
Simon est déjà intervenu plusieurs fois pour remettre la bonne réputation mais ça recommence régulièrement...
Comment venir à bout de ce problème ?
Merci pour votre aide
EXEMPLE DE RETOUR MAILER-DAEMON :
<xxxxxxxx@free.fr>: host mx1.free.fr[212.27.48.6] said: 550 Too many spams from
your IP (195.221.235.16), please visit http://postmaster.free.fr/ (in reply
to RCPT TO command)
Je relance ce vieux sujet car même sanction pour ma part : Les noms de domaines Free, Orange et Google me giclent vers spam automatiquement....
Simon est déjà intervenu plusieurs fois pour remettre la bonne réputation mais ça recommence régulièrement...
Comment venir à bout de ce problème ?
Merci pour votre aide
EXEMPLE DE RETOUR MAILER-DAEMON :
<xxxxxxxx@free.fr>: host mx1.free.fr[212.27.48.6] said: 550 Too many spams from
your IP (195.221.235.16), please visit http://postmaster.free.fr/ (in reply
to RCPT TO command)
- Simon Le Guével
- Administrateur
- Messages : 1307
- Enregistré le : 04 sept. 2010 12:30
- Compte LegTux : simon
- Localisation : Saint-Brieuc
- Contact :
Re: Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams
Bonjour,
On fait notre maximum mais il y a parfois des loupés.
Normalement, ces périodes ne durent pas très longtemps.
On fait notre maximum mais il y a parfois des loupés.
Normalement, ces périodes ne durent pas très longtemps.
Re: Mes adresses mail se font considérer comme des spams
Bonjour. En ce moment j'ai des mails qui vont dans les spams chez LIVE alors que ce n'était pas le cas, et pour une amie c'est google et live qui sont concerné. Sur mxtoolbox, il semble que l'IP 94.23.17.209 est listée sur SORBS. Y'a-t-il quelque chose à faire de notre côté ? Cordialement - JUH